Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5900HX is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the 5900HX gets 421.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
85.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
421.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
23.29k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
25.89k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
11.75k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
24.83k (x1.81)
TOTAL
88.01k
85.76k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-12400F
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
138.16k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
192.12k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
80.84k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
9.93k (x0.57)
TOTAL
512.23k
421.05k (x0.82)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
3070 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
4269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
1796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
9357 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
5900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
5064 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
5628 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
5398 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
18644 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4