Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
a50f00
Core
Alder Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
20.37k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
22.52k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
10.18k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
21.49k (x1.57)
TOTAL
88.01k
74.56k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-12400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
144.01k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
191.86k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
84.53k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
6.5k (x0.37)
TOTAL
512.23k
426.9k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4