Core i5-12400F vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
810f81
Core
Alder Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
14.48k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
23.84k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
5.43k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
5.46k (x0.4)
TOTAL
88.01k
49.21k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-12400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
54.39k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
88.77k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
20.04k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
5.48k (x0.31)
TOTAL
512.23k
168.69k (x0.33)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4