Core i5-12400F vs i7-12800H
Description
Both models i5-12400F and i7-12800H are based on Alder Lake architecture.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the i7-12800H gets 467.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-12800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the i7-12800H gets 467.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-12800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
906a3
Core
Alder Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/20
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
6x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2022
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
67.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
467.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
28.42k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
18.93k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
9.92k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
9.86k (x0.72)
TOTAL
88.01k
67.13k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
205.57k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
159.7k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
82.78k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
19.36k (x1.11)
TOTAL
512.23k
467.41k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
3549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
1840 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
10387 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i7-12800H
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
5921 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
3944 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
2066 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
2055 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
13986 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4