Core i5-12400F vs i3-12100F
Description
Both models i5-12400F and i3-12100F are based on Alder Lake architecture.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.5 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
90675
Core
Alder Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
340.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
39.54k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
23.79k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
11.96k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
13.52k (x0.99)
TOTAL
88.01k
88.81k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
148k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
123.08k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
52.73k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
16.67k (x0.95)
TOTAL
512.23k
340.49k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
5871 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4