Core i5-12400F vs i9-11900H
Description
The i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-11900H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400F gets a score of 512.2 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
806d1
Core
Alder Lake-S
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
88.01k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
512.23k points
584.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400F
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.79k
33.38k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
24.07k
27.12k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.44k
11.69k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.71k
17k (x1.24)
TOTAL
88.01k
89.19k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-12400F
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
212.6k
249.83k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
197.81k
237.26k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.35k
84.18k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.48k
13.2k (x0.76)
TOTAL
512.23k
584.47k (x1.14)
Performance/W
i5-12400F
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3271 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3043 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
269 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
7881 points/W
12988 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400F
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
8588 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5471 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2827 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3116 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
20003 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4