Core i5-12400 vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 2.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
406f1
Core
Arder Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/28
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
35840 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
17.8k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
16.51k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
4.47k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
2.56k (x0.17)
TOTAL
102.51k
41.35k (x0.4)
Multithread
i5-12400
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
494.82k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
514.13k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
132.87k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
20.8k (x0.96)
TOTAL
544.64k
1162.63k (x2.13)
Performance/W
i5-12400
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4