| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
306e4
Core
Arder Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
10 /20
TDP
65 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
11.96k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
23.92k
10.73k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.43k
4.59k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.84k
4.31k (x0.29)
TOTAL
77.43k
31.6k (x0.41)

Multithread

i5-12400

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
124.33k
218.24k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
168.8k
206.92k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
100.37k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.2k
11.45k (x0.54)
TOTAL
414.33k
536.99k (x1.3)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
23.84k
10.55k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
10.02k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
3.99k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
3.66k (x0.25)
TOTAL
77.51k
28.23k (x0.36)

Multithread

i5-12400

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
123.98k
215.04k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
176.89k
230.43k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.42k
96.87k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.78k
8.76k (x0.42)
TOTAL
419.07k
551.1k (x1.32)

Performance/W
i5-12400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1907 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2721 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1499 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
6447 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5418 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3205 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3290 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
17616 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4