Core i5-12400 vs Xeon E5-2660 v2
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2660 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 419.1 k points while the E5-2660 v2 gets 459.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2660 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
306e4
Core
Arder Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/12
10 /20
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
19.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
459.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
23.84k
7.26k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
6.9k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
2.77k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
2.55k (x0.18)
TOTAL
77.51k
19.48k (x0.25)
Multithread
i5-12400
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
123.98k
180.2k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
176.89k
191.43k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.42k
80.22k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.78k
7.46k (x0.36)
TOTAL
419.07k
459.31k (x1.1)
Performance/W
i5-12400
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1907 points/W
1897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2721 points/W
2015 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1499 points/W
844 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
6447 points/W
4835 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
E5-2660 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
5418 points/GHz
2420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3205 points/GHz
923 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3290 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
17616 points/GHz
6495 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4