| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs i7-9700F


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 414.3 k points while the i7-9700F gets 269.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
906ed
Core
Arder Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
269.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
4.67k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
17.16k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
5.7k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
14.37k (x0.97)
TOTAL
54.29k
41.9k (x0.77)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
26.31k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
97.53k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
31.53k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
8.94k (x0.41)
TOTAL
281.22k
164.31k (x0.58)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
16.8k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
23.92k
24.08k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.43k
6.06k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.84k
13.98k (x0.94)
TOTAL
77.43k
60.93k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
124.33k
92.79k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
168.8k
135.13k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
33.29k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.2k
8.64k (x0.41)
TOTAL
414.33k
269.85k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i5-12400
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1913 points/W
1428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2597 points/W
2079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1539 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
326 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
6374 points/W
4152 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
5509 points/GHz
3575 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5436 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3279 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3373 points/GHz
2975 points/GHz
TOTAL
17597 points/GHz
12964 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4