Core i5-12400 vs i7-10700
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i7-10700 gets 537.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
a0655
Core
Arder Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
74.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
537.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
30.66k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
25.64k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
5.98k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
12.25k (x0.83)
TOTAL
102.51k
74.53k (x0.73)
Multithread
i5-12400
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
240.28k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
234.3k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
56.12k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
7.02k (x0.32)
TOTAL
544.64k
537.73k (x0.99)
Performance/W
i5-12400
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
3697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
3605 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
863 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
8273 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i7-10700
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
6388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5341 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
1245 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
2553 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
15527 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4