| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs i5-5675R


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-5675R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
40671
Core
Arder Lake-S
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2022
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
194.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
4.14k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
14.35k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
4.94k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
5.47k (x0.37)
TOTAL
54.29k
28.91k (x0.53)

Multithread

i5-12400

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
16.02k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
54.6k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
18.69k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
16.87k (x0.78)
TOTAL
281.22k
106.18k (x0.38)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
12.86k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
23.92k
16.85k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.43k
5.19k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.84k
5.49k (x0.37)
TOTAL
77.43k
40.39k (x0.52)

Multithread

i5-12400

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
124.33k
50.07k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
168.8k
64.61k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
19.84k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.2k
17.09k (x0.81)
TOTAL
414.33k
151.6k (x0.37)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
23.84k
12.88k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
18.27k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
5.12k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
5.45k (x0.38)
TOTAL
77.51k
41.72k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-12400

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
123.98k
49.91k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
176.89k
70.3k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.42k
19.69k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.78k
16.92k (x0.81)
TOTAL
419.07k
156.83k (x0.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
21.91k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
18.59k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
5.2k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
5.72k (x0.39)
TOTAL
102.51k
51.43k (x0.5)

Multithread

i5-12400

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
84.92k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
72.09k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
20.13k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
17.07k (x0.79)
TOTAL
544.64k
194.2k (x0.36)

Performance/W
i5-12400
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4