Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
a70f41
Core
Arder Lake-S
Phoenix
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
32.74k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
27.35k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
14.23k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
27.41k (x1.85)
TOTAL
102.51k
101.73k (x0.99)
Multithread
i5-12400
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
236.69k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
202.63k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
102.8k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
11.28k (x0.52)
TOTAL
544.64k
553.41k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i5-12400
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4