| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 9 7950X


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7950X is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 7950X gets 1597.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 7950X is 2.9 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a60f12
Core
Arder Lake-S
Raphael
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM5
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/32
TDP
65 W
170 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
131072 kB
Date
January 2022
September 2022
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
121.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
1597.79k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
6.05k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
23.41k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
16.49k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
34.35k (x2.32)
TOTAL
54.29k
80.3k (x1.48)

Multithread

i5-12400

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
128.82k (x3.63)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
465.79k (x3.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
289.43k (x3.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
75.23k (x3.46)
TOTAL
281.22k
959.27k (x3.41)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.84k
26.86k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
30.05k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
16.15k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
31.74k (x2.19)
TOTAL
77.51k
104.8k (x1.35)

Multithread

i5-12400

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
123.98k
430.6k (x3.47)
Test#2 (FP)
176.89k
545.91k (x3.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.42k
289.57k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.78k
64.33k (x3.1)
TOTAL
419.07k
1330.41k (x3.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
40.61k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
31.82k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
16.63k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
32.28k (x2.18)
TOTAL
102.51k
121.33k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-12400

7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
683.17k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
563.45k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
286.77k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
64.4k (x2.98)
TOTAL
544.64k
1597.79k (x2.93)

Performance/W
i5-12400
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
4019 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
3314 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
379 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
9399 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
7950X
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
7124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5582 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
2917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
5663 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
21286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4