Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
a40f41
Core
Arder Lake-S
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
21.04k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
22.41k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
10.21k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
24.27k (x1.64)
TOTAL
102.51k
77.93k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-12400
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
158.65k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
215.86k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
89.45k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
14.77k (x0.68)
TOTAL
544.64k
478.73k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i5-12400
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4