Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.3 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.3 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
860f01
Core
Arder Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
427.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
16.66k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
26.01k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
9.31k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
9.15k (x0.62)
TOTAL
102.51k
61.12k (x0.6)
Multithread
i5-12400
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
144.48k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
192.46k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
83.17k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
7.51k (x0.35)
TOTAL
544.64k
427.61k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i5-12400
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
12218 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4