Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.1 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.1 times faster than the 3800XT. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
870f10
Core
Arder Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2022
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
17.57k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
27.38k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
9.35k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
23.9k (x1.61)
TOTAL
102.51k
78.2k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-12400
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
176.08k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
219.88k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
100k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
12.93k (x0.6)
TOTAL
544.64k
508.89k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i5-12400
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4