Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.3 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.3 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
800f82
Core
Arder Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
4.25k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
19.72k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
5.84k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
21.36k (x1.44)
TOTAL
54.29k
51.17k (x0.94)
Multithread
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
35.04k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
181.42k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
64.86k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
8.21k (x0.38)
TOTAL
281.22k
289.54k (x1.03)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
15.22k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.92k
24.12k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.43k
5.87k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.84k
21k (x1.41)
TOTAL
77.43k
66.21k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
124.33k
126.81k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
168.8k
229.86k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
61.74k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.2k
9.77k (x0.46)
TOTAL
414.33k
428.19k (x1.03)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.84k
14.44k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
24.92k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
5.8k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
19.07k (x1.32)
TOTAL
77.51k
64.24k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
123.98k
122.01k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
176.89k
220.34k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.42k
59.89k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.78k
9.9k (x0.48)
TOTAL
419.07k
412.13k (x0.98)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
15.34k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
25.75k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
5.79k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
17.95k (x1.21)
TOTAL
102.51k
64.83k (x0.63)
Multithread
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
123.07k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
239.3k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
60.6k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
8.18k (x0.38)
TOTAL
544.64k
431.14k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4