| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.9 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
800f82
Core
Arder Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
3.41k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
15.96k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
4.69k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
17.42k (x1.18)
TOTAL
54.29k
41.47k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-12400

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
20.88k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
110.37k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
39.25k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
6.66k (x0.31)
TOTAL
281.22k
177.16k (x0.63)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
13.76k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
23.03k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
5.12k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
15.23k (x1.03)
TOTAL
102.51k
57.13k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-12400

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
83.23k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
161.06k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
40.52k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
6.73k (x0.31)
TOTAL
544.64k
291.53k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-12400
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4