Core i5-12400 vs i9-13900K
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.2 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 3.2 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
b0671
Core
Arder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2022
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
1763.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
9.77k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
24.52k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
17.17k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
21.37k (x1.44)
TOTAL
54.29k
72.83k (x1.34)
Multithread
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
145.21k (x4.09)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
444.95k (x3.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
318.3k (x3.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
27.2k (x1.25)
TOTAL
281.22k
935.66k (x3.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
31.93k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
23.92k
31.54k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.43k
18.8k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.84k
20.82k (x1.4)
TOTAL
77.43k
103.09k (x1.33)
Multithread
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
124.33k
522.07k (x4.2)
Test#2 (FP)
168.8k
584.17k (x3.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
344.38k (x3.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.2k
25.36k (x1.2)
TOTAL
414.33k
1475.97k (x3.56)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
23.84k
31.8k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
32.83k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
18.37k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
21.13k (x1.46)
TOTAL
77.51k
104.13k (x1.34)
Multithread
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
123.98k
532.97k (x4.3)
Test#2 (FP)
176.89k
596.78k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.42k
342.96k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.78k
28.6k (x1.38)
TOTAL
419.07k
1501.31k (x3.58)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
58.6k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
33.29k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
17.77k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
19.49k (x1.32)
TOTAL
102.51k
129.15k (x1.26)
Multithread
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
804.04k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
613.45k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
311.08k (x3.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
34.5k (x1.59)
TOTAL
544.64k
1763.08k (x3.24)
Performance/W
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
14105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4