| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs i7-13700HX


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 2 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
b06f2
Core
Arder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/24
TDP
65 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
1070.39k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
23.84k
27.23k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
27.1k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
15.65k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
15.52k (x1.07)
TOTAL
77.51k
85.5k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
123.98k
277.49k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
176.89k
360.68k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.42k
173.57k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.78k
25.19k (x1.21)
TOTAL
419.07k
836.93k (x2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
48.57k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
28.78k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
15.6k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
16.46k (x1.11)
TOTAL
102.51k
109.41k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
486.01k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
386.1k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
173.21k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
25.08k (x1.16)
TOTAL
544.64k
1070.39k (x1.97)

Performance/W
i5-12400
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4