| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs i3-13100F


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
b06f5
Core
Arder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
47.14k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
25.77k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
13.25k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
14.77k (x1)
TOTAL
102.51k
100.94k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-12400

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
168.51k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
142.8k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
63.57k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
15.34k (x0.71)
TOTAL
544.64k
390.23k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i5-12400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4