| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
806c2
Core
Arder Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
4.57k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
17.21k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
9.97k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
14.98k (x1.01)
TOTAL
54.29k
46.75k (x0.86)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
12.75k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
45.98k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
27.86k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
20.06k (x0.92)
TOTAL
281.22k
106.66k (x0.38)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
30.89k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
25.57k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
10.64k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
15.66k (x1.06)
TOTAL
102.51k
82.77k (x0.81)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
96.34k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
95.75k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
32.29k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
15.2k (x0.7)
TOTAL
544.64k
239.58k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i5-12400
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4