| | | | | | |

Core i5-12400 vs i7-11700


Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
90672
a0671
Core
Arder Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
728.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
7.51k
5.48k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
18.66k
20.99k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.32k
12.58k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.8k
21.24k (x1.43)
TOTAL
54.29k
60.28k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
35.52k
44.15k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
138.43k
196.6k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
85.55k
102.57k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.72k
10.64k (x0.49)
TOTAL
281.22k
353.96k (x1.26)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
24.24k
18.05k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
23.92k
26.13k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.43k
13.92k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.84k
21.22k (x1.43)
TOTAL
77.43k
79.32k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
124.33k
160.49k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
168.8k
225.25k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
100k
113.88k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.2k
10.64k (x0.5)
TOTAL
414.33k
510.25k (x1.23)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
23.84k
18.96k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
25.09k
28.34k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.1k
13.26k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.48k
20.2k (x1.4)
TOTAL
77.51k
80.76k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
123.98k
164.31k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
176.89k
253.96k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.42k
115.28k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.78k
10.65k (x0.51)
TOTAL
419.07k
544.2k (x1.3)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
35.12k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
29.24k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
12.56k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
21.95k (x1.48)
TOTAL
102.51k
98.87k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-12400

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
304k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
304.7k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
109.64k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
10.64k (x0.49)
TOTAL
544.64k
728.98k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i5-12400
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
11215 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4