Core i5-12400 vs i5-11400F
Description
The i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-12400 gets a score of 544.6 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-11400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
90672
a0671
Core
Arder Lake-S
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x48 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
18432 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
102.51k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
544.64k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-12400
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
48.08k
31.66k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
25.6k
26.21k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.02k
11.96k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.81k
18.5k (x1.25)
TOTAL
102.51k
88.34k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-12400
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
230.14k
210.36k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
198.07k
203.84k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.78k
72.05k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.64k
9.4k (x0.43)
TOTAL
544.64k
495.65k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i5-12400
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3541 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3047 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1458 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
8379 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-12400
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
10927 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5819 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3186 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3365 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
23298 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4