| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
50654
Core
Alder Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1235U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
3k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
12.29k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
3.64k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
6.55k (x0.5)
TOTAL
51.61k
25.46k (x0.49)

Multithread

i5-1235U

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
29.24k
20.42k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
83.32k
95.83k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.53k
30.88k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
9.7k (x1.94)
TOTAL
172.07k
156.83k (x0.91)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
18.78k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
16.25k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
3.99k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
6.8k (x0.59)
TOTAL
81.64k
45.82k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-1235U

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
133.55k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
108.43k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
30.02k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
9.48k (x1.5)
TOTAL
297.46k
281.48k (x0.95)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4