Core i5-1235U vs Xeon W3520
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 288.4 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 3.9 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 288.4 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 3.9 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
106a5
Core
Alder Lake-U
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
10/12
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1235U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
23.53k
7.35k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
4.89k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
2.9k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
2.82k (x0.21)
TOTAL
74.99k
17.96k (x0.24)
Multithread
i5-1235U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
106.07k
29.69k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
115.88k
22.26k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.53k
14.91k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
6.29k (x1.07)
TOTAL
288.36k
73.16k (x0.25)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
7072 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7725 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4035 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
392 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
19224 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
5347 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5344 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3344 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3009 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
17044 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4