| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
306f2
Core
Alder Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2022
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
13.1k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
11.91k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
4.83k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
3.83k (x0.32)
TOTAL
73.15k
33.68k (x0.46)

Multithread

i5-1235U

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
105.42k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
109.99k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
44.56k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
17.7k (x3.07)
TOTAL
301.58k
277.66k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
20.99k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
11.9k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
4.72k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
3.75k (x0.32)
TOTAL
81.64k
41.36k (x0.51)

Multithread

i5-1235U

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
172.62k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
110.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
44.06k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
16.93k (x2.68)
TOTAL
297.46k
343.64k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4