| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs Xeon E3-1230 v5


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 288.4 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 7.6 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
506e3
Core
Alder Lake-U
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
37.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1235U
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
0.7k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
2.8k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
0.85k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
1.88k (x0.14)
TOTAL
51.61k
6.23k (x0.12)

Multithread

i5-1235U

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
29.24k
2.74k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
83.32k
12.87k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.53k
3.89k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
6.03k (x1.21)
TOTAL
172.07k
25.52k (x0.15)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1235U
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
23.53k
2.59k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
3.94k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
1k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
2k (x0.15)
TOTAL
74.99k
9.52k (x0.13)

Multithread

i5-1235U

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
106.07k
10.4k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
115.88k
16.64k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.53k
4.51k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
6.33k (x1.08)
TOTAL
288.36k
37.88k (x0.13)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
7072 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7725 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4035 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
392 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
19224 points/W
474 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
5347 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5344 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3344 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3009 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
17044 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4