| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs i9-10900KF


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 2.8 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0655
Core
Alder Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
10/12
10/20
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
825.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
35.87k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
31.43k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
7.34k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
15.73k (x1.36)
TOTAL
81.64k
90.37k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
377.56k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
347.59k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
88.08k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
12.24k (x1.94)
TOTAL
297.46k
825.47k (x2.78)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
6604 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4