| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
15.65k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
23.13k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
5.66k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
11.43k (x0.94)
TOTAL
73.15k
55.87k (x0.76)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
26.77k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
43.81k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
10.17k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
11.91k (x2.07)
TOTAL
301.58k
92.66k (x0.31)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
27.14k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
24.75k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
5.73k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
11.84k (x1.02)
TOTAL
81.64k
69.47k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
105.77k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
107.47k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
24.82k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
8.02k (x1.27)
TOTAL
297.46k
246.07k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4