| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs i5-10210U


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
806ec
Core
Alder Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
145.51k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
23.11k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
20.58k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
4.73k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
7.43k (x0.64)
TOTAL
81.64k
55.86k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
65.84k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
60.77k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
14.45k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
4.44k (x0.7)
TOTAL
297.46k
145.51k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
9701 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4