Core i5-1235U vs i3-10100
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0653
Core
Alder Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
22.74k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
20.31k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
4.71k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
7.65k (x0.66)
TOTAL
81.64k
55.41k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-1235U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
71.95k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
67.7k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
16.43k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
6.25k (x0.99)
TOTAL
297.46k
162.33k (x0.55)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4