| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs Celeron J4105


Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 288.4 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 4.7 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
706a1
Core
Alder Lake-U
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2022
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1235U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
1.68k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
5.29k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
2.75k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
3.44k (x0.26)
TOTAL
51.61k
13.16k (x0.26)

Multithread

i5-1235U

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
29.24k
6.39k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
83.32k
20.02k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.53k
10.22k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
4.94k (x0.99)
TOTAL
172.07k
41.57k (x0.24)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1235U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
23.53k
4.9k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
7.26k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
2.75k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
3.32k (x0.25)
TOTAL
74.99k
18.22k (x0.24)

Multithread

i5-1235U

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
106.07k
18.84k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
115.88k
27.45k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.53k
10.35k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
4.85k (x0.83)
TOTAL
288.36k
61.49k (x0.21)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
7072 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7725 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4035 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
392 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
19224 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
5347 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5344 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3344 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3009 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
17044 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4