Core i5-1235U vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7940HS is based on Zen 4.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 2.4 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 7940HS gets 718.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 2.4 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-U
Phoenix
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
BGA-FP7r2
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
113.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
718.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
38.25k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
29.92k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
15.5k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
29.89k (x2.58)
TOTAL
81.64k
113.57k (x1.39)
Multithread
i5-1235U
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
309.6k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
260.4k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
128.56k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
20.04k (x3.18)
TOTAL
297.46k
718.59k (x2.42)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
8846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
7440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
3673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
573 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
20531 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
7940HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
7355 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
2981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
21839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4