Core i5-1235U vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.7 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.7 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
a20f12
Core
Alder Lake-U
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/12
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
April 2022
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
83.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
814.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
22.6k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
24.85k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
11.25k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
24.8k (x2.14)
TOTAL
81.64k
83.5k (x1.02)
Multithread
i5-1235U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
258.21k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
342.24k (x3.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
155.3k (x3.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
59k (x9.35)
TOTAL
297.46k
814.74k (x2.74)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
1479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
562 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
7759 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
4709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
5167 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
17396 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4