Core i5-1235U vs Ryzen 7 4700U
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4700U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.1 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.1 times faster than the 4700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
860f01
Core
Alder Lake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2022
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
49.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
269.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
10.38k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
22.63k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
8.52k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
7.99k (x0.69)
TOTAL
81.64k
49.53k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-1235U
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
86.74k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
128.69k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
48.71k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
5.41k (x0.86)
TOTAL
297.46k
269.56k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
5783 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
8579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
3248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
17970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5520 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
2078 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1949 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
12080 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4