Core i5-1235U vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
800f82
Core
Alder Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2022
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
4.25k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
19.72k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
5.84k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
21.36k (x1.62)
TOTAL
51.61k
51.17k (x0.99)
Multithread
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.24k
35.04k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
83.32k
181.42k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.53k
64.86k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
8.21k (x1.64)
TOTAL
172.07k
289.54k (x1.68)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.53k
15.22k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
24.12k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
5.87k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
21k (x1.59)
TOTAL
74.99k
66.21k (x0.88)
Multithread
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
106.07k
126.81k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
115.88k
229.86k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.53k
61.74k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
9.77k (x1.66)
TOTAL
288.36k
428.19k (x1.48)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
14.44k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
24.92k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
5.8k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
19.07k (x1.57)
TOTAL
73.15k
64.24k (x0.88)
Multithread
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
122.01k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
220.34k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
59.89k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
9.9k (x1.72)
TOTAL
301.58k
412.13k (x1.37)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
15.34k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
25.75k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
5.79k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
17.95k (x1.55)
TOTAL
81.64k
64.83k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
123.07k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
239.3k (x2.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
60.6k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
8.18k (x1.3)
TOTAL
297.46k
431.14k (x1.45)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4