Core i5-1235U vs Ryzen 5 5500U
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 5500U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.1 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
860f81
Core
Alder Lake-U
Lucienne
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
10/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
53.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
261.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
15.63k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
23k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
8.62k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
6.51k (x0.56)
TOTAL
81.64k
53.76k (x0.66)
Multithread
i5-1235U
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
90.38k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
118.74k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
48.39k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
4.4k (x0.7)
TOTAL
297.46k
261.91k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
6025 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
7916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
3226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
294 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
17461 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
3908 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
2156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1628 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
13441 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4