Core i5-1235U vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
870f10
Core
Alder Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/12
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
4.2k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
17.36k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
7.5k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
23.79k (x1.8)
TOTAL
51.61k
52.85k (x1.02)
Multithread
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.24k
22.11k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
83.32k
108.04k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.53k
56.81k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
36.39k (x7.29)
TOTAL
172.07k
223.36k (x1.3)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.53k
15.38k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
21.94k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
7.97k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
24.76k (x1.87)
TOTAL
74.99k
70.05k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
106.07k
96.91k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
115.88k
135.12k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.53k
70.39k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
56.43k (x9.59)
TOTAL
288.36k
358.85k (x1.24)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
15.04k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
20.95k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
8.57k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
21.71k (x1.79)
TOTAL
73.15k
66.27k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
94.36k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
141.73k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
69.38k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
32.72k (x5.68)
TOTAL
301.58k
338.19k (x1.12)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
16.04k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
24.47k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
8.38k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
21.66k (x1.87)
TOTAL
81.64k
70.55k (x0.86)
Multithread
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
113.63k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
143.55k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
63.84k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
27.34k (x4.33)
TOTAL
297.46k
348.35k (x1.17)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4