Core i5-1235U vs FX 4100
Description
The i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4100 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 301.6 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 6.8 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 301.6 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 6.8 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
600f12
Core
Alder Lake-U
Zambezi
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2022
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
22.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
44.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
7.65k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
6.9k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
2.88k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
4.75k (x0.39)
TOTAL
73.15k
22.18k (x0.3)
Multithread
i5-1235U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
15.53k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
15.13k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
7.98k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
5.67k (x0.98)
TOTAL
301.58k
44.31k (x0.15)
Performance/W
i5-1235U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
7452 points/W
163 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8279 points/W
159 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3991 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
384 points/W
60 points/W
TOTAL
20106 points/W
466 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
5235 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5480 points/GHz
1815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3158 points/GHz
758 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2753 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
TOTAL
16626 points/GHz
5836 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4