| | | | | | |

Core i5-1235U vs i5-12500H


Description
Both models i5-1235U and i5-12500H are based on Alder Lake architecture.

Alder Lake is the 12th generation of Intel Core. It uses the 10nm proccess and was the first to introduce a hybrid architecture with Performance cores and Efficiency cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1235U gets a score of 297.5 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
906a3
Core
Alder Lake-U
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1700
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
10/12
12/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
1x1280+4x2048 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2022
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
81.64k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
297.46k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.33k
6.93k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.27k
18.76k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.8k
9.46k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
8.17k (x0.62)
TOTAL
51.61k
43.33k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.24k
18.04k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
83.32k
66.78k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.53k
37.55k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
6.08k (x1.22)
TOTAL
172.07k
128.45k (x0.75)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
23.53k
21.93k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.51k
18.79k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
10.5k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.24k
8.11k (x0.61)
TOTAL
74.99k
59.33k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
106.07k
61.07k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
115.88k
86.08k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.53k
41.08k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.88k
6.02k (x1.02)
TOTAL
288.36k
194.25k (x0.67)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
23.03k
21.11k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
24.11k
19.61k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.9k
9.53k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.11k
7.72k (x0.64)
TOTAL
73.15k
57.97k (x0.79)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
111.78k
61.44k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
124.18k
93.66k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.87k
40.09k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.76k
6.01k (x1.04)
TOTAL
301.58k
201.2k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1235U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
36.73k
22.61k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.09k
17.73k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.24k
9.63k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.58k
8.4k (x0.73)
TOTAL
81.64k
58.37k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-1235U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
130.18k
85.49k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
110.21k
94.93k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.76k
39.15k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
6.08k (x0.96)
TOTAL
297.46k
225.65k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i5-1235U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
8679 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7348 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3384 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
19831 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1235U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
8349 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5020 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2555 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2631 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
18555 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4