Core i3-1220P vs i5-8250U
Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the i5-8250U gets 153.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 2.6 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the i5-8250U gets 153.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 2.6 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
806ea
Core
Alder Lake-P
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2022
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
53.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
153.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
22k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
19.55k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
4.41k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
7.83k (x0.66)
TOTAL
81.92k
53.8k (x0.66)
Multithread
i3-1220P
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
70.15k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
63.27k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
15.29k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
4.8k (x1.79)
TOTAL
404.74k
153.5k (x0.38)
Performance/W
i3-1220P
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
4676 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
4218 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
1019 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
320 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
10233 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
6471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
2304 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
15823 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4