| | | | | | |

Core i3-1220P vs i5-10300H


Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 1.6 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a0652
Core
Alder Lake-P
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
10/12
4/8
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
246.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
27.14k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
24.75k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
5.73k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
11.84k (x1)
TOTAL
81.92k
69.47k (x0.85)

Multithread

i3-1220P

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
105.77k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
107.47k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
24.82k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
8.02k (x2.98)
TOTAL
404.74k
246.07k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i3-1220P
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4