Core i3-1220P vs i3-8130U
Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 4.6 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 4.6 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
806ea
Core
Alder Lake-P
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
10/12
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2022
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
21.09k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
19.41k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
4.05k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
2.8k (x0.24)
TOTAL
81.92k
47.35k (x0.58)
Multithread
i3-1220P
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
38.23k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
38.89k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
8.75k (x0.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
2.47k (x0.92)
TOTAL
404.74k
88.35k (x0.22)
Performance/W
i3-1220P
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4