| | | | | | |

Core i3-1220P vs i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1220P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
806d0
Core
Alder Lake-P
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2022
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
30.84k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
26.38k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
12.66k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
11.74k (x0.99)
TOTAL
81.92k
81.62k (x1)

Multithread

i3-1220P

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
294.86k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
280.92k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
113.9k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
20.16k (x7.51)
TOTAL
404.74k
709.85k (x1.75)

Performance/W
i3-1220P
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4