| | | | | | |

Core i3-1220P vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.4 times faster than the i3-1220P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a70f41
Core
Alder Lake-P
Phoenix
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
28 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2022
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
32.74k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
27.35k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
14.23k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
27.41k (x2.3)
TOTAL
81.92k
101.73k (x1.24)

Multithread

i3-1220P

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
236.69k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
202.63k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
102.8k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
11.28k (x4.2)
TOTAL
404.74k
553.41k (x1.37)

Performance/W
i3-1220P
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4