| | | | | | |

Core i3-1220P vs Ryzen 9 7945HX


Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 7945HX is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the 7945HX gets 1313.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7945HX is 3.2 times faster than the i3-1220P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
a60f12
Core
Alder Lake-P
Dragon Range
Architecture
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA-FL1
Cores/Threads
10/12
16/32
TDP
28 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
16x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
65536 kB
Date
March 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
113.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
1313.94k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
37.43k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
30.7k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
15.16k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
29.78k (x2.5)
TOTAL
81.92k
113.07k (x1.38)

Multithread

i3-1220P

7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
556.68k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
482.32k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
225.46k (x3.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
49.48k (x18.42)
TOTAL
404.74k
1313.94k (x3.25)

Performance/W
i3-1220P
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
10121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
8770 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
4099 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
900 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
23890 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
7945HX
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
2807 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
5515 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
20939 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4