Core i3-1220P vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 1.1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 1.1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906a4
860f01
Core
Alder Lake-P
Renoir
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
10/12
8/16
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2022
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
14.87k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
21.53k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
8.39k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
8.21k (x0.69)
TOTAL
81.92k
53k (x0.65)
Multithread
i3-1220P
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
124.63k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
158.62k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
69.79k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
7.53k (x2.8)
TOTAL
404.74k
360.57k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i3-1220P
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4