| | | | | | |

Core i3-1220P vs Ryzen 5 4600H


Description
The i3-1220P is based on Alder Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1220P gets a score of 404.7 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1220P is 1.2 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906a4
860f01
Core
Alder Lake-P
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1744
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
10/12
6/12
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1280/2x2048 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
March 2022
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
81.92k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
404.74k points
334.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1220P
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
37.43k
15.48k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
19.6k
22.82k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.99k
8.63k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.9k
7.17k (x0.6)
TOTAL
81.92k
54.11k (x0.66)

Multithread

i3-1220P

4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
178.85k
117.98k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
153.82k
146.43k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
65.54k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.69k
4.77k (x1.78)
TOTAL
404.74k
334.72k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i3-1220P
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6387 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5494 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2478 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
14455 points/W
7438 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1220P
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
8506 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4455 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2953 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2704 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
18618 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4